12.12.06

Chapter Two :Whale Strandings

Devon woke up in the little town of Hobart, Tasmania, she shortly found herself walking along the beach. It was Tuesday November. 28th 2004 the beach was crawling with scientists and wildlife officials pouring over several of the 169 whales and dolphins lying dead on several different beaches around Australia and New Zealand over the past three days. Authorities and volunteers worked through Monday night to save dozens of whales and dolphins after their standings.

Devon went over to the worker whom was coordinating the cleanup effort. And asked how many whales, the response came back…there were 96 long-finned pilot whales and bottle-nosed dolphins had died after the first beaching on Sunday at King Island, midway between the Australian mainland and the southern island state of Tasmania. This Tasmanian wildlife officer Shane Hunniford said another 19 long-finned pilot whales had died in a separate beaching on Monday on Maria Island, 60 km (37 miles) east of the Tasmanian capital were she was staying in Hobart. He told her there were 43 whales, which had beached themselves on Maria Island, but officials had managed to save 24 that were still alive.

Across the Tasman Sea in New Zealand, a mass grave was dug on a beach at Opoutere, 100 km (62 miles) east of Auckland on the North Island, for 53 dead pilot whales. Officials there said 73 whales had become stranded there on Sunday, but 20 were saved. Of those 20, more were expected to die because many were too weak to follow the others out to sea.

“Some of them had suffered pretty significantly on the beach. “New Zealand conservation department manager Hohn Gaukrodger told reporters, as Devon stood close by and listened.

Devon had been sent to investigate and report back to her government about her findings that linked Sonar Tests to Whale Strandings. Since released to the media on May 1, 2001, by Earthwatch’s supported scientist Ken Balcomb revealed the physical damage sustained by whales that died in the Bahamas following Navy sonar tests.

http://www.earthwatch.org/pubaffairs/news/balcomb.html

Her boss her uncle wanted to know if these sonar testing was the cause of these present strandings. The U.S. Navy’s new sonar system that uses extremely loud, low-frequency sounds to locate submarines over wide areas of ocean. That system, many researchers and environmental advocates contend, has the potential to interfere with or even kill sound-sensitive whales and dolphins. The whole issue came to a head on March 15, 2000, when 17 cetaceans of 4 species stranded themselves in the Bahamas right after the Navy conducted a low-level sonar test antisubmarine warfare Gap Exercise in the area. Although the sonar used was “ normal standard” and operating a midrange frequencies. (3.5-7 kHz, 235 dB), an ocean duct 125-150 meters deep may have contributed to the sound traveling much farther and at higher intensity than anticipated. The unusually large number of whales stranded and the timing of their strandings have been taken by people to be evidence of a correlation between the sonar and whale deaths.
Two of those people are Earthwatch researchers Kenneth Balcomb and Diane Claridge, who have been working on a cetacean census in the Bahamas with Earthwatch teams since 1992 on their project Bahamas Whales and Dolphins. They were the scientists who documented most of the 16 stranded whales and a dolphin, assisted in rescue efforts to return some of the whales to sea, and collected data that may prove vital in the controversy over experimental, low-frequency sonar tests the navy has been conducting. An astonishing 14 of the 17 stranded cetaceans were beaked whales, which are uncommon and rarely strand because they are deep divers of the open ocean. In the Bahamas study, Blainville's (dense)-beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) are sighted more frequently than Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris). Moreover, six of the seven stranded animals known to have died were beaked whales, all but one of them Cuvier's beaked whales. All six beaked whales that died showed evidence of pressure trauma, which the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Navy consider is "highly likely”, linked to the sonar tests. High-decibel sonar tests in other parts of the world have also coincided with stranded whales, but the Bahamas' whales showed the first clear sign of internal damage that might have been linked to the tests. And the stranded whales may only have been the tip of the iceberg. This year's Earthwatch teams have sighted no Cuvier's beaked whales.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Could the Australian mass strandings and many others have been caused by sonars very far away, too far away to cause physical harm? Extremely social animals will all react to one group member showing fear; the whole group may flee from something only one recognizes as a threat. If one whale or dolphin has learned to fear the sound of a sonar, like the 53C deployed for many years, and reacts every time one is heard, all the group members may learn to fear that sound, even at very low levels. If a sonar source seems to approach such a group (gets louder), and they all happen to flee towards shore (where they are inexperienced with shallows) might at least some strand? Once a few are caught others may get too close trying to help (as Australian events have proven). Is this what has caused some mass strandings? Perhaps the only way to prove this theory is to document the behavior of groups at sea exposed to sonars. This theory suggests that large numbers of cetaceans can be driven from essential habitats and behaviors by sonars heard at threshold levels, affecting most animals within thousands of square miles. If this is even partly true, sonars may cause population-level events, causing much more damage than anyone could imagine.
Natural loud sounds in the ocean may cause similar reactions. A recent, unique mass stranding in Mozambique followed five earthquakes centered in the ocean within 100 kilometers.
William Rossiter
President
Cetacean Society International
www.csiwhalesalive.org

Synde Arason said...

questo video è di 2 anni fa. cancellato + volte online lo riproponiamo. Si ricorda che un fulmine NON è in grado di scaricarsi in mare ILLUMINANDO decine di metri d'acqua rendendola "fiammeggiante" . nel filmato purtroppo tagliato non si vede una imbarcazione guardiacostiera colpita dall' HAARP .... cm tutti sanno tali barche sono predisposte con apparecchiature anti-fulmini (cm logico) ; inoltre non si capirebbe come gli animali che abitualmente sentono il pericolo si siano avvicinati al campo magnetico generato invece che allontanarsi.

Earth Is Not Orbiting The Sun

Earth Is Not Orbiting The Sun in the way we were taught More to do with Something Wrong With The Sun Moon & Earth series. STOP PRESS !! !! ..... View New OFFICIAL Info: 4 Magnetic Poles Forming On The Sun In May 2012 PLEASE Click Here http://youtu.be/lxLcDiiFfCM Here we find an understanding of Why the Earth & our solar system do not actually orbit the Sun as taught, "Rather", We follow or better still, are dragged by the Sun in a Spiral Pattern through the universe & time. This video offers explanations how, besides spinning on its axis and rotating as if going 'Around' the Sun, the Earth is shown to 'Follow' the Sun's movement through the Milky Way galaxy, in a continuous Spiral, not a Flat elliptical plane, thus we find a 3D universe as opposed to the accepted 2D. ** Believe it or not, there is no empirical evidence that the Earth actually orbits the sun ! ** This compilation of videos runs thus: "The solar system's motion thru space by The Resonance Project / Nassim Haramein" This simple animation was created by Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project Foundation This is a video clip that every human should see. Many of us have been taught about how the solar system works by viewing a physical model that has the sun in the middle with the planets going around and around in a simple circular orbit without properly accounting for the motion of the sun (aprox. 450,000 miles per hour). Because the both sun and the galaxy are moving through space, the Earth spirals an incredible distance through space in a year's time. How far the Earth moves depends on the reference point you are using for something "stationary" or "background" even though all objects in the universe are in motion. The Earth rotates at 0-1040 mi/hr (depends on latitude) The Earth orbits the sun at aprox. 66,629 mi/hr The sun orbits the galactic centre at aprox. 447,000 mi/hr In just considering how fast the sun is moving, we know the Earth travels at least 3,918,402,000 miles in a years time! (as it also orbits around the sun) Total speed of the Earth moving through space is difficult to approximate do to the combination of motions. Using Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation it is estimated the total motion of the Earth through space is aprox. 1,342,000 mi/hr Or 11,763,972,000 miles in 1 year! (which is still only 0.2% the speed of light!) The old model might make one picture being back where you started after a year of time has past, when in fact, you are over 11 BILLION miles from where you were a year ago! I hope this video helps people to visualize what the motion of the Earth in our solar system looks like. For more information on Nassim Haramein and The Resonance Project, Please visit: http://www.theresonanceproject.org" --- http://www.youtube.com/user/EarthPilgrims "Nassim Haramein describing the limitations of the 2D solar system image, and how our evolution imprints space time. Excerpt from the film 'Earth Pilgrims' " --- http://www.youtube.com/user/aukruger "This animation is a video screenshot from Voyage through The Solar System version 1.20 (1989) and shows the earth's true motion in spirals. Besides spinning on its axis and rotating around the Sun, the Earth also follows the Sun's movement through the Milky Way galaxy. " Please Visit http://theresonanceproject.org/ http://www.earthpilgrims.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/aukruger http://www.YouTube.Com/MichelDezanger